KBMFeasibility WorkbenchKerala Building Mitra
build …
step 1 — describe the site

Describe the site or the question

Type a rough brief in your own words. KBM extracts facts from it — it never invents any. Anything it can't find becomes a visible gap in the packet below.

step 2 — confirm the packet

The project packet — every fact carries its source

Green facts came from your brief. Blue facts KBM derived from official data. Amber facts are assumptions — confirm or correct them before relying on any result. Corrections become stated inputs only on the next live engine run.

No packet yet — describe the site above and press Extract facts.

Attach evidence

Upload actual local evidence files into KBM. Files are stored and classified by the backend; parser status and non-claim rules stay visible.

Accepted: .pdf, .png, .jpg, .jpeg, .webp, .dxf, .dwg

Review evidence details — all candidate facts, diagnostics and confirmation queue

No evidence attached yet.

Kerala site screen — the questions that change everything

These sit outside KMBR/KPBR but can stop a permit outright. Most plots carry none of them — everything starts as “no known flag”; mark Suspected or Yes only where it applies.

What happens next

1
You build the packet
Fill what you know. Nothing more is needed to start.
2
KBM checks readiness
Shows what's missing and what can already run.
3
You choose a route
Preliminary feasibility, or just a rule question.
4
KBM runs the engine
Deterministic checks only. No noise, no guessing.
5
You get curated output
Clear answer, drawings, checks, and next steps.

Nothing is invented. Nothing is hidden. KBM only tells you what the rules and the data can honestly support.